Defense & ESG: Beyond the False Dichotomy

The rising global conflicts and increased defense spending have created an apparent contradiction for ESG-conscious investors. While defense investments are surging—global military expenditure reached US$2443 billion in 2023, up 6.8% from 2022—many ESG funds remain hesitant to engage with the sector. This tension raises a critical question: Is combining defense and ESG truly impossible, or are we framing the discussion incorrectly? This article explores how principled approaches can reconcile these seemingly opposing forces.

Beyond “Defense or ESG” – A Nuanced Perspective

The notion that defense and ESG principles are fundamentally incompatible oversimplifies a complex reality. Defense serves legitimate national security purposes, protecting civil liberties and establishing peace—values that align with social governance priorities. However, the sector presents substantial ESG risks, including human rights impacts, corruption vulnerabilities, and environmental damage.

Rather than viewing this as an either/or scenario, responsible investors need frameworks that acknowledge both security imperatives and ESG responsibilities. This requires moving beyond blanket exclusions toward nuanced assessments of specific activities, governance practices, and impact management strategies within defense companies.

Principled Risk Assessment for Defense Investments

A principles-based approach provides clarity amid complexity. Responsible investors should consider:

1. International humanitarian law compliance – Screening investments against prohibited weapons conventions and arms embargo restrictions
2. Human rights due diligence – Evaluating companies’ processes for preventing their products from contributing to rights violations
3. Full lifecycle accountability – Assessing environmental impacts throughout manufacturing, deployment, and decommissioning

These principles allow investors to differentiate between defense activities that support legitimate security needs and those that pose unacceptable ESG risks.

Integration Strategies for Responsible Defense Investing

Implementing ESG considerations in defense investments requires robust methodologies. Effective approaches include:

• Developing sector-specific ESG metrics that capture defense-relevant impacts
• Engaging actively with companies on responsible business conduct
• Establishing clear red lines for activities incompatible with international norms
• Supporting transparency initiatives that enhance accountability

Conclusion

The narrative of irreconcilable conflict between defense and ESG represents a false dichotomy. While significant tensions exist, principled approaches can help organizations navigate this complex landscape effectively. By focusing on international norms, human rights frameworks, and environmental stewardship, investors can develop nuanced strategies that recognize legitimate security needs while managing material ESG risks.

How Ksapa Can Help

Ksapa specializes in developing tailored defense sector ESG frameworks that respect both security imperatives and responsible investment principles. Our services include:

• Defense-specific ESG risk assessment methodologies
• Stakeholder engagement strategies for sensitive sectors
• Implementation guidance for human rights due diligence in conflict-affected contexts
• Training programs for investment teams on international humanitarian law compliance

Let Ksapa help your organization move beyond simplistic exclusions toward principled, balanced approaches that meet your fiduciary duties and stakeholder expectations in this challenging sector.

Image by Freepik